Nationality Declaration Flags and Seals The Apocalypse of a Moor Our Fight Republic Clothing Co. Contact Us

Noble Drew Ali International Law Significant U.S. History Cases and Codes Misconceptions Living in the Matrix

Significant U.S. Historical Events

As it pertains to the history of our people, there are obviously a few very important points that were left out of our school history classes. This page is just going to identify the significant events relevant to the history of our people. Some events may not be as significant as others, but they are events that few of our people know of.

Part of the mission of the Moorish Republic is to awaken our people with relevant information about our history. We do this by presenting significant and verifiable events and documents that few of our people know about. These historical events and documents also give reason to the direction of the Moorish Republic.

In 1609 and 1610, the European colonists were cannibalising their dead because they were starving to death. Only 24 years later, in 1634, they began to enact punitive legislation to remedy the shortage of people willing to do the back-breaking work of clearing and farming the land. There are several incidences of slavery, including white slavery, which began appearing in the Maryland colony. Slavery in North America began through laws enacted by colonists. This page contans some of the actual laws created by the several United States of America.

On May 13, 1607 A.D., the first lasting European colony was established by the Virginia Company. By 1609, the colonists were practicing cannibalism to the extent that they were digging up dead bodies and eating them in order to survive.  Even though they were trading with the Algonquin, they still were not able to sustain themselves.  In 1610, they were about to abandon the colony, when the supply ships returned with supplies and provisions.

In 1638, the Maryland colony issued the first public proclamation called “The Doctrine of Exclusion”.  The policy determined that no one of African descent nor their offspring shall be permitted to enjoy the fruits of white society.  By 1663, the policy was enlarged to stipulate that “black” people shall constitute a life-long, available, uncompensated, non-compensated, non-competitive, well-disciplined, permanently subordinated work force, which shall be separated from white society.

That law also demonstrates that only 20 to there were large numbers of dark skinned people moving about through the colony in the early years. If there was no active importation of slaves, who were the people of African descent that they were talking about?  They had to have been talking about the heavily melanated people whom they labeled as “Indians”, and were already here before they got here, and they later called “negros”. They merely called us African because of our dark skin.

Nearly 100 years after the first colony was established, in 1705, the Virginia colony codified a set of laws which applied to the slaves called the ‘Slave Codes’, and standardized the public policy on slaves as well as white behavior towards slaves.  Virginia also conferred the status of property to “blacks”.

1710 saw the introduction of a law that would have Our ancestors turn on one another just to be free.  This law is no longer on the books in the form that it originally was.  However, it has been renamed and reworded in the statutes, and it is still used as a technique to get people to tell on one another. The Meritorious Manumission Act provided that any ‘negro’ could gain their freedom by: (1) Saving a white person’s life, (2) Protecting a white person’s property, (3) Inventing something that a white person could profit from.  Many of the slave rebellions were suppressed or thwarted before they could begin because of this law, however, like today, most of the people who told, were not freed after they told, but given easier jobs.

In 1740, in response to the South Carolina Stono Rebellion of 1739, the Negro Act of 1740 was passed by the South Carolina legislature, and then most of the southern slave holding states.  The act made it illegal for any slaves, African or indian, travel, assemble in groups, raise food, earn money and learn to read or write.  The act also made it legal for slave owners to kill rebellious slaves, if necessary.

Territorial conflicts between the British and French caused further disarray amongst the nations of indigenous people who already fractured.  Rather than remaining neutral in the foreigners’ disputes, the indigenous nations chose sides, causing further conflict within their own ranks.  From around 1756 to 1763, the indigenous people fought on both sides of the war between the British and French, and lost large amounts of their people while fighting each other.  The schools mislabeled the war as the French/Indian war as if the British had nothing to do with it.

In 1779, after the Revolutionary War, the Reconstruction of history began.  It was actually a continuation of the destruction of indigenous culture, however, now they were teaching the enslaved indigenous people that they were from Africa instead of America.  The result of that indoctrination, is Our current situation.

In 1786, the still unbroken Moroccan-American Treaty of Friendship, was negotiated by the United States.  The treaty was drawn up by representatives of the United States.  I must stop at this point to make some connections.  Circa 1776, Morocco recognized the United States of America as a sovereign nation.  50 years after the Negro Act of 1740, and just four years after the treaty was signed, Francis, Daniel, Hammond and Samuel filed a petition to the South Carolina legislature on behalf of themselves and their wives, Fatima, Flora, Sarah and Clarinda.  The men were citizens of Morocco, turned prisoners of war.

Per the treaty, they were delivered to a European captain.  But instead of delivering them back to Morocco, he sold them back into slavery in South Carolina.  After they had bought their freedom, they filed a petition to be tried as Moroccan citizens, as opposed to negro, black and colored slaves, tried under the Negro laws.  The result of that petition is the Sundry Free Moors Act of 1790.

The act determined that “no Law of this State can in its Construction or Operation apply to them, and that persons who were subjects of the Emperor of Morocco being Free in this State are not triable by the Law for the better Ordering and Governing of Negroes and other Slaves.”  Even though the act was never made into law, it did serve as an advisory opinion.  Coincidentally, 1790 also seen the development of the first immigration and naturalization acts.

1856 saw the Dred Scott case, in which the U.S. Supreme court ruled that the U.S. constitution has no power to make those of African descent or nativity into citizens of a state, and that the states themselves had no power to make them into citizens.

1863 saw the first dissolution of the U.S. Constitution when the slaveholding states walked out of congress sine die, or without setting a date to reconvene according to Article I, section 4, clause 2.

In 1868, the congress forced the ratification of the 14th Amendment. The amendment was the first act of separating the United States in Congress Assembled from the rest of the states. The amendment also created a U.S. citizen separate and distinct from a state citizen. The U.S. constitution no longer applies to the state citizens, giving ens legis entities or corporations all of the constitutional protections. The amendment is also a restatement of almost everything that came before it, which is why some call it the 14th Amendment constitution.

2008 saw the election of the first "black" president of the United States under the Constitution for the United States of America. This may have been what prompted the first apologies for slavery from the House and Senate.

Stay Tuned